Dasgupta, Aditya. 2018. Technological Change and Political Turnover: The Democratizing Effects of the Green Revolution in India. American Political Science Review. [journal website][appendix][Indian keywords project][LiveMint][The Print]
Can technological change, as a form of “creative destruction”, contribute to political turnover? This paper investigates a large-scale historical natural experiment: the impact of the green revolution.
Dasgupta, Aditya, Kishore Gawande, and Devesh Kapur. 2017. (When) Do Anti-poverty Programs Reduce Violence? India’s Rural Employment Guarantee and Maoist Conflict. International Organization. Vol. 71 (3): pp.605-32. [journal website][appendix][replication data]
Drawing on a policy experiment, we demonstrate that anti-poverty programs can mitigate civil conflict, but also highlight the role of state capacity in shaping these effects.
Dasgupta, Aditya and Daniel Ziblatt. 2015. How did Britain Democratize? Views from the Sovereign Bond Market. The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 75 (1): pp.1-29. [journal website][replication data]
To assess competing theories of democratization, we analyze British sovereign bond market responses to the Great Reform Acts.
We examine the reaction of the nineteenth century sovereign bond market to the rise of mass suffrage in Europe and the Americas.
What explains local bureaucratic weakness? We draw lessons from a nationwide survey of the capacity and time usage of rural development officials in India.
This paper argues that access to government programs and services requires both top-down connection to the ruling party as well as bottom-up civic engagement.
This paper provides evidence that voters employ a heuristic that rewards the enactment of new programs to a greater extent than quality of implementation.
This paper investigates the distributive politics of red tape, the time-consuming bureaucratic hurdles and minutiae attached to the pursuit of government benefits.